EU NIS2 Directive and Implications for BAS-BMS Cybersecurity

The EU NIS2 Directive (Network and Information Security 2 Directive), which replaces the original NIS Directive, aims to strengthen cybersecurity requirements across critical sectors, including energy, healthcare, transportation, and digital infrastructure. While not explicitly focused on building automation systems (BAS), its implications for such systems are significant, particularly for facilities considered critical infrastructure.

Key Implications of NIS2 Directive for Building Automation Systems (BAS)

1. Inclusion of BAS in Risk Assessments:

   • BAS are integral to the operation of many critical facilities, such as hospitals, airports, and data centers. These systems must now be included in broader cybersecurity risk assessments and incident reporting frameworks as required by the NIS2 Directive.

2. Enhanced Security Obligations:

   • Organizations managing BAS in critical sectors will need to comply with stricter security requirements, including:
     • Risk management measures: Identifying and addressing vulnerabilities in BAS.
     • Incident reporting: Reporting cybersecurity incidents involving BAS to national authorities within a short timeframe (e.g., 24–72 hours).
     • Supply chain security: Ensuring that third-party providers of BAS comply with NIS2 standards.

3. Broader Scope:

   • The NIS2 Directive expands the definition of “essential services” to include entities managing smart buildings for critical infrastructure. This means BAS operators might fall under the directive’s jurisdiction if they support critical services.

4. Operational Technology (OT) Security Focus:

   • Building automation often relies on OT devices, which have traditionally been overlooked in cybersecurity. NIS2 emphasizes securing OT alongside IT, requiring measures like network segmentation, real-time monitoring, and secure remote access.

5. Penalties for Non-Compliance:

   • Failure to comply with the NIS2 Directive requirements can result in substantial fines (up to 2% of global turnover) and reputational damage, incentivizing better protection for BAS.

6. Interdependencies and Third-Party Risks:

   • As BAS often rely on IoT and third-party services, the NIS2 Directive demands thorough vetting of vendors to ensure they adhere to the directive’s standards, reducing risks from supply chain attacks.

 

Potential Challenges for BAS Operators

• Legacy Systems: Many BAS rely on outdated hardware and software, making compliance more challenging.
• Integration of IoT Devices: IoT devices in BAS are often entry points for cyberattacks, requiring enhanced security measures.
• Cost of Upgrades: Meeting the NIS2 Directive standards may involve significant investment in upgrading or replacing insecure components.

In summary, the NIS2 Directive elevates the importance of securing BAS as part of broader critical infrastructure protection, emphasizing proactive risk management, compliance, and collaboration with supply chain partners.

Blog Post Summary – All of our recent posts listed on one page